Question 1 of 6 Fundamentals Concept
What is the difference between affinity and avidity?
Short answer
Affinity describes binding between one binding site and one epitope. Avidity describes the combined stability or strength of multivalent engagement, which depends on geometry and antigen density.
Why
For a simple monovalent interaction, affinity is often summarized with KD and kinetic on/off rates. An IgG can use two arms to bind epitopes on a cell, reducing apparent dissociation because one arm can remain engaged while the other rebinds. That multivalent advantage depends on epitope spacing, flexibility, receptor density, assay format and steric access.
A high apparent cell binding signal is therefore not direct evidence of higher intrinsic Fab affinity. Compare monovalent Fab and intact IgG where practical, collect kinetic binding data on well-controlled surfaces, and titrate antigen density. A bivalent antibody might appear stronger on a high-density cell line but lose much of its advantage on cells expressing few receptors.
Distinguish KD from apparent EC50 and report the molecular format used.
Common mistakes
- Treating a whole-IgG cell binding EC50 as an intrinsic monovalent KD
The interviewer might ask next
How would you demonstrate a density-dependent avidity effect experimentally?