thebench.bio #1 Ecosystem for the Bio-Tech Industry
All Immunology questions

Question 16 of 20 Intermediate Scenario

How is anti-drug antibody testing for a biologic structured?

Short answer

The FDA recommends a multi-tiered approach. A sensitive screening assay flags possible positives, a confirmatory assay shows the binding is specific to the drug, a titration assay measures how much antibody is present, and a neutralization assay tests whether the antibodies block the drug's activity.

Why

The tiers trade sensitivity for specificity in steps. The FDA's 2019 guidance asks that the screening assay be set to a false positive rate of about 5 percent, so true positives are rarely missed. The confirmatory assay, usually adding excess drug to see whether the signal drops, removes false positives.

Titer matters because effects on pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy may track titer and persistence more than incidence. Neutralizing antibodies interfere with the drug's binding to its target, and their effect may matter more than simple incidence. The guidance recommends that screening and confirmatory IgG and IgM assays reach a sensitivity of at least 100 ng per milliliter, with some flexibility based on risk.

Drug in the sample can hide antibodies, so drug tolerance must be tested. The guidance also warns that comparing immunogenicity rates across products is misleading, because results depend on assay sensitivity, drug tolerance, sampling times and the patients. For example, an assay with poor drug tolerance may report low incidence simply because patients still had drug in their blood when sampled.

Sampling before dosing, at trough, and after washout helps.

A strong answer covers

  • Screening, confirmatory, titer and neutralization tiers
  • Screening cut point with about 5 percent false positives
  • Drug tolerance can hide antibodies
  • Titer and neutralizing activity link to clinical impact
  • Incidence is not comparable across products and assays

Common mistakes

  • Reporting screening positives as confirmed anti-drug antibodies
  • Ignoring circulating drug when choosing sampling times
  • Comparing immunogenicity rates between two products tested with different assays